系统首页 站点列表 分类列表 投稿指南 网管声明 网站简介 顾问简介 消息列表 友情网站 文章总目录 来稿登载 返回主页
1.李炳铁拓变论网站建立 2.明人指路网站建立 3.我们极为敬重的地震预测科学研究者郑联达教授因病医治无效,于2010年2月27日23点56分在北京逝世,享年93岁。 4.付昱华网站建立 5.梅晓春物理学网站建立

重现费马大定理费马奇妙证明(中文摘要英文全文)

蒋春暄 (jiangchunxuan@sohu.com) 上传2008.03.23 浏览327


重现费马大定理费马奇妙证明(中文摘要英文全文)

蒋春暄

(北京机电工程总体设计部,北京,100854)

摘要:采用复双曲函数和复三角函数我们重现费马大定理费马奇妙证明[1-7]。我们讨论三种证明:(1)蒋奇妙证明,(2)Fermat奇妙证明,(3)Frey-Ribet-Wiles证明。Ribenbiom[11]指出有些数学家不满意采用椭园曲线和模型证明方法,可能是错?也可能是对?

关键词:费马大定理;奇妙证明

Reapperance of Fermat’s Marvelous Proofs for Fermat’s Last Theorem

JIANG Chun-xuan

( Beijing System Design Institute of Electro-Mechanic Engineering, P. O. Box 3924, Beijing 100854, P. R. China)

jiangchunxuan@sohu.com

Abstract: Using the complex hyperbolic functions and complex trigonometric functions we reappear the Fermat’s marvelous proofs for Fermat’s last theorem (FLT) [1-7]. We present three proofs: (1) Jiang’s marvelous proofs, (2) Fermat’s marvelous proofs and (3) Frey-Ribet-Wiles proofs. Ribenbiom [11] points out that there are some mathematicians who are not satisfied with the method of proof using elliptic curves and modular form, perhaps wrongly? or rightly?

Key words: Fermat last theorem; Marvelous proofs.

MR(1991) Subject Classification: 11D41/CLC number: O156. 2

1. Introduction

In 1637, the reading of Diophantus’ Arithmetica, in particular, the part on the Pythagorean equation, inspired Fermat to write in his copy of Diophantus’ monograph:

It is impossible for a cube to be written as a sum of two cubes or a fourth power to be written as the sum of two fourth powers or, in general, for any number which is a power greater than the second to be written as a sum of two like powers. I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain.

Fermat never published a proof and, by the unsuccessful quest for a solution of Fermat’s last theorem, mathematicians started to believe the that Fermat actually had no proof. However, no counterexample was found..

In this paper using the complex hyperbolic functions and complex trigonometric functions we reappear Fermat’s marvelous proofs for FLT. Fermat proved that there are no integral solutons for the FLT exponent , Euler proved FLT exponent .

2. Jiang’s Marvelous Proofs

Theorem 1. It is sufficient to prove that the FLT exponents are odd primes. But this proof has great difficulty. We consider that FLT exponents are the composite numbers. Let , where is an odd prime. Using the complex hyperbolic functions we have the Fermat’s equations [2, 5, 7]

(1)

(2) .

Fermat proved (1), therefore (2) has no rational soultions for any odd prime .

Note. Let . Every factor of the FLT exponent has a Fermat’s equation [1-7].

Theorem 2. Let , where is an odd prime. Using the complex hyperbolic functions we have the Fermat’s equations [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

(3)

(4) ,

(5) .

Euler proved (3) and (4), therefore (5) has no rational solutions for any odd prime .

Note. Let . Every factor of the FLT exponent has a Fermat’s equation [1-7].

3. Fermat’s Marvelous Proofs

Theorem 3. Fermat’s equation

(6)

has no integral soultions with , if . We assume that if and are integral numbers, then is irrational numbers.

Proof 1. Let , where is an odd prime. From (6) we have the Fermat’s equations

(7)

(8)

(9)

Since Fermat proved the FLT exponent , we prove that (7) and (8) hae no integral solutions, that is and are irrational numbers. We prove that (9) has no integral solutions for any odd prime , that is is irrational numbers.

We rewrite (8) and (9) as

(10)

(11)

where ,.

Fermat proved (7) and (10), therefore (11) has no integral solutions for any odd prime .

Note. Let . Every factor of the FLT exponent has a Fermat’s equation [1-7].

Proof 2. Let , where is an odd prime. From (6) we have the Fermat’s equations

(12)

(13)

(14)

Since Euler proved the FLT exponent , therefore (12) and (13) have no integral solutions, that is and are irrational numbers. We prove (14) has no integral solutions, that is is irrational number.

We rewrite (13) and (14) as

(15)

(16)

where ,.

Euler proved (12) and (15), therefore (16) has no integral solutions for any odd prime , that is C and D are irrational numbers.

Note. Let . Every factor of the FLT exponent has a Fermat’s equation [1-7].

4. Frey-Ribet-Wiles Proofs

(Ⅰ) From elliotic curve to Fermat’s equation

Using elliptic curve we prove FLT. We discuss Fermat’s equation

(17)

integral solutions. Frey [8] write (17) Fermat’s equation as elliptic curve

(18) .

He conjectures that (18) elliptic curve would imply (17) Fermat’s equation. Ribet [9] prove that (18) elliptic curve should imply (17) Fermat’s equation. Wiles [10] prove that (18) elliptic curve over Q is modular. But he does not discuss and prove (17) Fermat’s equation.

Note. Fermat’s equation is th power, but elliptic curve is 3th power. This proof is incredible to number theorists. Ribenboim [11] points out that there are some mathematicians who are not satisfied with the method of proof using elliptic curves and modular form, perhaps wrongly ? or rightly ?

(Ⅱ) From Fermat’s equation to elliptic curve

Using Fermat’s equation we prove elliptic curve. We discuss elliptic curve

(19)

integral solutions. Fabs write (19) elliptic curve as Fermat’s equation

(20) .

He conjectures that (20) Fermat’s equation would imply (19) elliptic curve. Rabs prove that (20) Fermat’s equation should imply (19) elliptic curve. Jiang [1-7] prove that (20) Fermat’s equation no integral solutions. But he does not discuss and prove (19) elliptic curve.

Note. (I) and (II) cases are the same. Both proofs are incredible to mathematicians.

References

[1] 蒋春暄,费马大定理已被证明,潜科学,2,17-20(1992)

[2] 蒋春暄,三百多年前费马大定理已被证明,潜科学,6,18-20(1992)

[3] Chun-Xuan, Jiang, On the factorization theorem of circulant determinant, Algeras, Groups and Geometries, 11, 371-377 (1994).

[4] Chun-Xuan, Jiang, Fermat’s last theorem was proved in 1991, Preprints (1993), In: Foundamental open problems in science at the end of the millennium, T. Gill, K. Liu and E. Trell, eds, 555-558 (1999).

[5] Chun-Xuan, Jiang, On the Fermat-Santilli isotheorem, Algebras, Groups and Geometries, 15, 319-349 (1998).

[6] Chun-Xuan, Jiang, Complex hyperbolic functions and Fermat’s last theorem, Hadronic journal supplement, 15, 341-348 (2000).

[7] Chun-Xuan, Jiang, Foundations of Santilli’s isonumber theory with applications to new cryptograms, Fermat’s theorem and Goldbach’s conjecture, pp. 225-263, Inter. Acad. Press, 2002, MR2004c: 11001, http: // www.i-b-r.org/docs/Jiang/pdf.

[8] G. Frey, Links between stable elliptic curve and certain Diophantine equations, Annales Universitatis Sarviensis 1, 1-40 (1986).

[9] K. A. Ribet, On modular representations of Gal () arising from modular forms, Invent. Math. 100, 431-476 (1990).

[10] A. Wiles, Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem, Ann. Math. 141, 443-551 (1995).

[11] Paulo Ribenboim, Fermat’s last theorem for amateurs, Spring-Verlag, New York, 1999, pp.366.

姓名 Email



本目录下所有文章:
2010.03.13 Riemann Paper (1859) Is False 19.69KB
2010.03.13 Prime Theorem 5.32KB
2010.03.13 On The Consecutive Integers 14.3KB
2010.03.02 Gaps Among Products of m Primes 30.84KB
2010.01.23 Gaps Among Products of m Primes 21.69KB
2009.05.05 蒋春暄的创新道路 39.59KB
2009.05.05 世界最大数学丑闻 38.05KB
2008.02.24 引力是什么? 15.87KB